Mr Vic Toews got a taste of his own medicine. He was outraged by this "dirty internet trick" and that this government twiiter account amounted to "tax payer dollars" being used to facilitate this dirtiness.

Isn't this exactly what C-30 proposes do do? Tax payer's paying to have the police go on electronic fishing trips.

A fascinating interview on Antiwar Radio. The historical perspective that Tom Woods brings to the table makes me wonder what will happen in 2016.

Bill C-30 is the rewriting of an internet surveillance bill tabled (as bill C-51), but not passed, in Canadian Parliament in recent years. It has just been re-tabled as “the Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act” on February 14th 2012.

I’ve been trying to write a piece on Parliament’s re-introduction of the old bill C-51 Internet Surveillance Bill. I’ve found information about the newly rewritten version of this bill and a couple other related bills very difficult to find. The past versions of this bill would have allowed police to force your Internet Service Provider, and Cellphone Provider to hand over all of your digital par

Canadians may soon be electronically eves-dropped upon by the police if this bill passes through parliament.

ACTRA and other cultural groups will continue to pursue the goal of compelling ISP to contribute funds, Waddell says. “There are other avenues, there are other acts.”

Today, after a unanimous Canadian Supreme Court ruling, we can all finally breathe a sigh of relief in knowing what we already knew; that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are not broadcasters.

Canada’s Supreme Court ruled that Internet service providers such as Rogers Communications Inc. and BCE Inc. shouldn’t be regulated as broadcasters when they offer video and audio content online.